Date: 20.12.2017 / Article Rating: 5 / Votes: 618
Libraries.professay.info #Narrative paper requirements

Recent Posts

Home >> Uncategorized >> Narrative paper requirements

Narrative paper requirements

Oct/Wed/2017 | Uncategorized








Narrative Paper Requirements - …

Narrative paper requirements

Academic Proofreading -
Narrative Paper Requirements - …

SAT / ACT Prep Online Guides and Tips. With the 2016 AP English Language and Composition exam approaching on requirements Wednesday, May 11, it’s time to make sure that you’re familiar with all aspects of the exam. Branding Case Study India! In this article, I’ll give a brief overview of the narrative paper requirements, test, do a deeper dive on each of the sections, discuss how the exam is scored, offer some strategies for studying, and finally wrap up with some essential exam day tips. The AP Language and Composition exam tests your rhetorical skills. Info Promotional! Essentially, how do authors construct effective arguments in their writing? What tools do they use? How can you use those tools to craft effective writing yourself?

That is the essence of rhetorical analysis. The exam has two parts: the first section is an hour-long, 52-55 question multiple-choice section that asks you questions on the rhetorical construction and techniques of a series of nonfiction passages. The second section is free response. It starts with a 15-minute reading period, and then you’ll have 120 minutes to paper requirements, write three analytical essays: one synthesizing several provided texts to study india, create an argument, one analyzing a nonfiction passage for paper its rhetorical construction, and one creating an original argument in florida response to a prompt. You will have about 40 minutes to write each essay, but no one will prompt you to move from narrative, essay to essay—you can structure the 120 minutes as you wish. In the next sections I’ll go over each section of the exam more closely—first multiple choice, and then free response. The AP English Language and Composition Multiple-Choice. The multiple-choice section is primarily focused on how well you can read and understand nonfiction passages for their use of rhetorical devices and tools. You will be presented with 4-5 passages, about which you will receive a small amount of orienting information, e.g. “This passage is excerpted from a collection of countryside essay, essays on boating” or “This passage is requirements excerpted from an essay written in 19th-century Haiti.” You will be asked somewhere from 10-15 questions per phd research proposal passage. There are, in general, eight question types you can expect to encounter on the multiple-choice section of the exam.

I’ve taken my examples from the paper, sample questions in the “Course and Exam Description.” Magic eight-ball says there are eight types of multiple-choice questions! These questions are focused on countryside verifying that you understood what a certain part of the passage was saying on a concrete, literal level. You can identify these questions from phrases like “according to” “refers,” etc. The best way to narrative paper requirements, succeed on these questions is to go back and re-read the part of the passage referred to very carefully. These questions take reading comprehension one step further—they are primarily focused on what the author is implying without directly coming out and saying it. These questions will have a correct answer, though, based on evidence from the passage.

Which interpretation offered in the answers does the passage most support? You can identify questions like these from words like “best supported,” ‘“implies,” “suggests,” “inferred,” and so on. Type 3: Overall Passage and Author Questions. These questions ask about overall elements of the passage or the author, such as the cass business school personal statement, author’s attitude on the issue discussed, the narrative requirements, purpose of the social learning essay plan, passage, the passage’s overarching style, the audience for the passage, and so on. You can identify these because they won’t refer back to a specific moment in the text. For these questions, you’ll need to think of the passage from narrative requirements, a “bird’s-eye view” and consider what all of the small details together are combining to say.

Type 4: Relationships Between Parts of the Text. Some questions will ask you to describe the relationship between two parts of the text, whether they are paragraphs or specific lines. Foreclosure Essay! You can identify these because they will usually explicitly ask about the relationship between two identified parts of the narrative requirements, text, although sometimes they will instead ask about a relationship implicitly, by saying something like “compared to the rest of the passage.” Type 5: Interpretation of Imagery/Figurative Language. These questions will ask you about the deeper meaning or implication of figurative language or imagery that is used in proposal help the text. Essentially, why did the author choose to narrative paper requirements, use this simile or this metaphor? What is s/he trying to phd research proposal, accomplish?

You can generally identify questions like this because the question will specifically reference a moment of figurative language in the text. However, it might not be immediately apparent that the phrase being referenced is figurative, so you may need to go back and look at it in requirements the passage to be sure of what kind of question you are facing. Type 6: Purpose of Part of the phd research help, Text. Still other questions will ask you to identify what purpose a particular part of the text serves in the author’s larger argument. What is the author trying to accomplish with the particular moment in the text identified in the question?

You can identify these questions because they will generally explicitly ask what purpose a certain part of the text serves. You may also see words or phrases like “serves to” or “function.” These questions will ask you to identify a rhetorical strategy used by the author. They will often specifically use the phrase “rhetorical strategy,” although sometimes you will be able to narrative requirements, identify them instead through the florida, answer choices, which offer different rhetorical strategies as possibilities. Some questions will ask you about stylistic moments in the text and paper requirements, the effect created by the those stylistic choices. What is the author evoking through their stylistic choices?

You can identify these questions because they will generally mention “effect.” Some very important stylish effects going on here. Branding Study! The AP English Language and Composition Free Response. The free response section has a 15-minute reading period. After that time, you will have 120 minutes to narrative, write three essays that address three distinct tasks. Business School Personal Statement! Because the first essay involves reading sources, it is suggested that you use the entire 15-minute reading period to read the sources and narrative requirements, plan the first essay. Case Study India! However, you may want to glance at the other questions during the reading period so that ideas can percolate in narrative paper the back of your mind as you work on the first essay. Essay One: Synthesis. For this essay, you will be briefly oriented on an issue and then given anywhere from six-eight sources that provide various perspectives and information on the issue. You will then need to write an argumentative essay with support from the documents. If this sounds a lot like a DBQ, as on the history AP exams, that’s because it is! However, this essay is much more argumentative in florida foreclosure essay nature—your goal is to persuade, not merely interpret the documents.

In the second essay, you’ll be presented with an excerpt from paper requirements, a nonfiction piece that advances an argument and case study india, asked to write an essay analyzing the rhetorical strategies used to construct the passage’s argument. You will also be given some orienting information—where the narrative paper, passage was excerpted from, who wrote it, its approximate date, where it was published (if at all), and to florida foreclosure, whom it was directed. In the third essay, you will be presented with an issue and asked to write a persuasive essay taking a position on narrative requirements the issue. You will need to support your position with evidence from study, your “reading, experience, and observations.” This doesn't look like a very well-constructed argument. Narrative Paper! How The AP Language and Composition Exam Is Scored. The multiple-choice section of the coursework code, exam is narrative requirements worth 45% of your score, and the free-response section is worth the other 55%. So each of the countryside, three free-response essays is worth about 18% of your score. As on other APs, your raw score will be converted to a scaled score of 1-5.

This exam has a relatively low 5 rate. Only 9.9% of narrative requirements, test takers received a 5 last year, although 55% of students received a score of 3 or higher. In terms of essay, how the raw score is obtained, the multiple-choice section is similar to narrative, other AP multiple-choice sections: you receive a point for coursework info promotional every question you answer correctly, and narrative requirements, there is no penalty for guessing. For each free-response question, you will be given a score from 0-9, based on a rubric. The rubrics all assess, in general, 3 major things: How well you responded to the prompt: Did you completely and fully address all of the tasks presented in crisis essay the prompt, without misunderstanding any of them? How convincing and well-supported your argument was: Do you take a clear position that is not overly basic, simplistic, or obvious? Can you comprehensively support your position with evidence?

Is your evidence well-chosen and well-explained? Do you tie everything back to your main argument? Have you thought through the implications of narrative requirements, your stated position? How strong your writing was: Does your writing clearly communicate your ideas? Are your sentences not just grammatically correct, but sophisticated?

Do you have a consistent style and a strong vocabulary? Is your paper well-organized and logically arranged? Each rubric broadly assesses these three factors. Learning Theory! However, each task is also different in nature, so the rubrics do have some differences. I’ll go over each rubric—and what it really means—for you here. Essays earning a score of 9 meet the criteria for the score of 8 and, in addition, are especially sophisticated in narrative their argument, thorough in promotional code development, or impressive in narrative requirements their control of language. You did everything an 8 essay did, but either your argument is particularly compelling or well-supported, or your writing is particularly effective/sophisticated. Essays earning a score of 8 effectively address the florida essay, task in the prompt. They develop their argument by effectively synthesizing at narrative least three of the sources. The evidence and explanations used are appropriate and coursework info, convincing. The prose demonstrates a consistent ability to control a wide range of the elements of effective writing but is not necessarily flawless.

You thoroughly responded to paper requirements, the prompt, successfully using (and citing) at least three of the sources to support your argument. Theory Plan! You supported your argument in a persuasive way. Your writing is competent, although there may be some minor errors. Essays earning a score of 7 meet the criteria for the score of 6 but provide more complete explanation, more thorough development, or a more mature prose style. Your essay did everything a 6 essay does but is requirements either better explained, better argued, or better-written; however, it’s not quite up to an 8 level. Essays earning a score of 6 adequately address the task in the prompt. They develop their argument by adequately synthesizing at florida foreclosure least three of the sources. The evidence and explanations used are appropriate and sufficient. The language may contain lapses in diction or syntax, but generally the prose is clear. You responded to the prompt in a reasonable way. You used and cited at narrative least 3 of the sources in creating your argument.

You supported your argument in a reasonably persuasive way, although not as compellingly as an 8 essay. Your writing is generally understandable. Essays earning a score of 5 address the task in the prompt. Proposal! They develop their argument by synthesizing at least three sources, but how they use and explain sources is somewhat uneven, inconsistent, or limited. The writer’s argument is generally clear, and narrative paper, the sources generally develop the writer’s position, but the essay, links between the paper requirements, sources and the argument may be strained.

The writing may contain lapses in diction or syntax, but it usually conveys the student’s ideas. You did respond to the prompt. You used and florida foreclosure, cited at requirements least 3 of the sources in creating your argument, but you did not use all of them particularly effectively. The connection between the documents and your argument is underdeveloped. Your writing is mostly understandable but may have errors. Essays earning a score of countryside essay, 4 inadequately address the task in the prompt. Narrative Requirements! They develop their argument by synthesizing at least two sources, but the evidence or explanations used may be inappropriate, insufficient, or unconvincing. The sources may dominate the coursework info code, essay’s attempts at development, the narrative paper requirements, link between the argument and the sources may be weak, or the student may misunderstand, misrepresent, or oversimplify the sources.

The prose generally conveys the countryside essay, student’s ideas but may be inconsistent in paper controlling the elements of effective writing. You did not adequately respond to coursework info code, the prompt. You used and narrative, cited at least two sources, but you did not effectively link them to your argument. Countryside! Your essay may summarize sources instead of truly taking a position, or you may have misread the sources. Your writing is not consistently clear. Essays earning a score of 3 meet the criteria for the score of 4 but demonstrate less success in narrative paper addressing the task. They are less perceptive in their understanding of the sources, or their explanation or examples may be particularly limited or simplistic. The essays may show less maturity in their control of writing.

Your essay did not adequately respond to florida crisis essay, the prompt. Your interpretation of the sources is incorrect or your argument is narrative overly simplistic. Phd Research Proposal Help! Your writing is paper requirements overly basic or unclear. Essays earning a score of demonstrate little success in addressing the task in branding india the prompt. They may merely allude to knowledge gained from reading the sources rather than cite the sources themselves. These essays may misread the sources, fail to narrative paper requirements, develop a position, or substitute a simpler task by merely summarizing or categorizing the sources or by merely responding to the prompt tangentially with unrelated, inaccurate, or inappropriate explanation. Essays that score 2 often demonstrate consistent weaknesses in writing, such as grammatical problems, a lack of development or organization, or a lack of control. You barely addressed the prompt. You may not cite any sources directly, misunderstand the sources, never take a position, or write things that are not relevant to the prompt.

Writing is very weak, including grammatical issues. School Personal! Essays earning a score of 1 meet the criteria for paper the score of 2 but are undeveloped, especially simplistic in their explanation, weak in their control of writing, or do not allude to florida essay, or cite even one source. Your writing barely addressed the prompt. Narrative! Explanations are extremely simple, writing is incredibly weak, or sources are not used or cited at all. Indicates an off-topic response, one that merely repeats the prompt, an entirely crossed-out response, a drawing, or a response in a language other than English.

You made no attempt to respond to countryside essay, the prompt. Narrative! Indicates an entirely blank response. Crisis! You didn’t write anything! Time to synthesize this dough into narrative paper requirements some cookies. Essays earning a score of 9 meet the criteria for the score of 8 and, in addition, are especially sophisticated in phd research proposal their argument, thorough in their development, or impressive in their control of language. You achieved everything an 8 essay did, but the quality of either your argument or your writing is exceptional. Narrative Paper Requirements! Essays earning a score of 8 effectively analyze the rhetorical strategies used by coursework promotional code, the author to develop his/her argument.

They develop their analysis with evidence and explanations that are appropriate and convincing, referring to the passage explicitly or implicitly. Requirements! The prose demonstrates a consistent ability to control a wide range of the elements of effective writing but is not necessarily flawless. You successfully and persuasively analyzed the rhetoric of the theory plan, excerpt in a way that is strongly supported by specific examples in the text. Your writing is versatile and strong. Essays earning a score of 7 meet the criteria for the score of narrative requirements, 6 but provide more complete explanation, more thorough development, or a more mature prose style.

You achieved everything a 6 essay did, but your argument was either better explained or supported or your writing was of florida foreclosure crisis essay, a higher caliber. Essays earning a score of 6 adequately analyze the rhetorical strategies used by the author to develop his/her argument. They develop their analysis with evidence and paper requirements, explanations that are appropriate and sufficient, referring to the passage explicitly or implicitly. The essay may contain lapses in diction or syntax, but generally the prose is clear. School Msc! You successfully analyzed the rhetoric of the excerpt, using appropriate references to the text. Your writing was generally understandable.

Essays earning a score of narrative, 5 analyze the essay, rhetorical strategies used to develop the paper, author’s argument. The evidence or explanations used may be uneven, inconsistent, or limited. The writing may contain lapses in diction or syntax, but it usually conveys the student’s ideas. You analyzed the countryside essay, rhetoric of the excerpt, although evidence from the passage may have been poorly used or deployed. Your writing is mostly understandable but may have errors. Essays earning a score of 4 inadequately analyze the rhetorical strategies used by the author to develop his/her argument.

These essays may misunderstand the passage, misrepresent the strategies the author uses, or may analyze these strategies insufficiently. The evidence or explanations used may be inappropriate, insufficient, or unconvincing. The prose generally conveys the student’s ideas but may be inconsistent in controlling the elements of effective writing. You did not analyze the rhetoric in the passage in requirements a reasonable way. You may have misread the passage or misidentified the author’s rhetorical strategies, or you may simply not have supported your argument enough. Textual evidence may not be appropriate to the task at hand. Your writing is not consistently clear.

Essays earning a score of 3 meet the theory plan, criteria for the score of 4 but demonstrate less success in analyzing the rhetorical strategies the author uses to develop his/her argument. They are less perceptive in their understanding of the passage or the author’s strategies, or the explanations or examples may be particularly limited or simplistic. The essays may show less maturity in control of writing. A 3 essay has similar weaknesses to narrative paper requirements, a 4 essay, but displays less understanding of the passage or the florida essay, author’s intent. The writing may also be even more inconsistent or basic. Requirements! Essays earning a score of case study india, 2 demonstrate little success in analyzing the rhetorical strategies used by narrative requirements, the author to develop his/her argument. These essays may misunderstand the branding study india, prompt, misread the passage, fail to paper, analyze the social learning, strategies used, or substitute a simpler task by responding to the prompt tangentially with unrelated, inaccurate, or inappropriate explanation. The essays often demonstrate consistent weaknesses in writing, such as grammatical problems, a lack of development or organization, or a lack of control. You barely analyzed the paper, passage. Branding Study India! You may have misunderstood the assigned task, seriously misread the passage or the narrative, author’s intent, or responded to something other than the prompt.

Writing is case consistently weak. Essays earning a score of 1 meet the criteria for the score of 2 but are undeveloped, especially simplistic in their explanation, or weak in their control of language. A 1 essay is has similar weaknesses to a 2 essay, but is even more poorly supported or poorly written. Indicates an off-topic response, one that merely repeats the prompt, an entirely crossed-out response, a drawing, or a response in a language other than English. Paper! You made no attempt to cass business school statement, respond to the prompt. Indicates an entirely blank response. Narrative Paper! You didn’t write anything! Examine your texts closely!

Argumentative Essay Rubric. Essays earning a score of 9 meet the criteria for florida essay the score of 8 and, in addition, are especially sophisticated in their argument, thorough in narrative requirements their development, or particularly impressive in proposal their control of language. You meet the paper requirements, criteria for an 8, plus you have either a particularly strong argument, strong support, or strong writing. Essays earning a score of 8 effectively develop a position on the issue presented. The evidence and explanations used are appropriate and convincing, and the argument is especially coherent and well developed. The prose demonstrates a consistent ability to control a wide range of the elements of effective writing but is countryside not necessarily flawless. You persuasively address the prompt, using strong evidence to narrative, support your argument. Your writing is strong but not necessarily perfect.

Essays earning a score of phd research, 7 meet the criteria for the score of 6 but provide a more complete explanation, more thorough development, or a more mature prose style. A 7 essay meets the criteria for narrative paper requirements a 6 essay but is either better-argued, better-supported, or more well-written. Essays earning a score of promotional, 6 adequately develop a position on the issue presented. The evidence and explanations used are appropriate and sufficient, and the argument is coherent and adequately developed. The writing may contain lapses in diction or syntax, but generally the prose is clear. You reasonably address the prompt, using reasonable evidence to paper requirements, support your argument. Coursework Promotional Code! Your writing is generally good but may have some mistakes. Narrative! Essays earning a score of 5 develop a position on branding case study the issue presented. The evidence or explanations used may be uneven, inconsistent, or limited. The writing may contain lapses in diction or syntax, but it usually conveys the student’s ideas. You do address the prompt, although the support for narrative paper your argument may be sparse or not wholly convincing.

Your writing is usually clear, but not always. Essays earning a score of 4 inadequately develop a position on the issue presented. The evidence or explanations used may be inappropriate, insufficient, or unconvincing. The argument may have lapses in coherence or be inadequately developed. The prose generally conveys the student’s ideas but may be inconsistent in controlling the elements of effective writing. You do not adequately address the prompt or form a strong argument.

Your evidence may be sparse or unconvincing, or your argument may be too weak. Your writing is not consistently clear. Essays earning a score of 3 meet the criteria for the score of 4 but demonstrate less success in developing a position on the issue. The essays may show less maturity in control of writing. 3 essays meet the criteria for a 4 but have either weaker arguments or less clear writing. Essays earning a score of florida crisis essay, 2 demonstrate little success in developing a position on narrative the issue. These essays may misunderstand the prompt, or substitute a simpler task by responding to promotional code, the prompt tangentially with unrelated, inaccurate, or inappropriate explanation.

The prose often demonstrates consistent weaknesses in writing, such as grammatical problems, a lack of development or organization, or a lack of coherence and control. You barely addressed the assigned task. Your essay may misunderstand the narrative paper, prompt. Your evidence may be irrelevant or inaccurate. Your writing is weak on multiple levels. Personal Statement! Essays earning a score of narrative, 1 meet the criteria for the score of coursework promotional code, 2 but are undeveloped, especially simplistic in their explanation and argument, weak in their control of language, or especially lacking in coherence. A 1 essay meets the paper requirements, criteria for a 2 but the argument is even less developed or coherent. Indicates an off-topic response, one that merely repeats the social learning essay plan, prompt, an entirely crossed-out response, a drawing, or a response in a language other than English. Paper Requirements! You made no attempt to respond to the prompt. Indicates an entirely blank response. You didn’t write anything!

As you can see, the synthesis rubric is focused on info promotional code how you used sources, the analysis rubric is focused on how well you analyzed the text, and the argument rubric is narrative requirements focused on theory essay the strength of your argumentative writing without outside sources. Achieving a high score on narrative requirements an AP Lang and Comp essay is no easy feat. The average scores on essays last year were all under 5, with the Synthesis essay at about a 4.7 and the other two at just over cass personal msc, 4. So even getting a 7 out of 9 is very impressive! You may feel that these rubrics are a little bit vague and narrative requirements, frustratingly subjective. And, indeed, what separates a 6 from a 7, a 7 from an 8, an 8 from a 9 may not be entirely clear in every case, no matter the countryside essay, pains taken by the College Board to standardize AP essay grading. That said, the paper requirements, general principles behind the rubrics— respond to the prompt, build a strong argument, and write well —hold up. If you can write strong essays in the time allotted, you’ll be well on your way to code, a score of 5 even if your essays got 7s instead of 8s. So what can you do to prepare yourself for narrative the frenzy of AP English Lit activity?

The best kind of case study, frenzy is a puppy frenzy! Unlike its cousin, the AP English Literature and Composition exam, the AP Language and Composition exam (and course) have very little to do with fiction or poetry. So some students used to more traditional English classes may be somewhat at a loss as to what to do to prepare. Luckily for you, I have a whole slate of preparation tips for you! A major thing you can do to prepare for the AP Lang and Comp exam is to read nonfiction— particularly nonfiction that argues a position , whether explicitly (like an op-ed) or implicitly (like many memoirs and narrative requirements, personal essays). Read a variety of non-fiction genres and topics, and pay attention to the following: What is the author’s argument?

What evidence do they use to support their position? What rhetorical techniques and strategies do they use to build their argument? Are they persuasive? What counterarguments can you identify? Do they address them?

Thinking about these questions with all the essay, reading you do will help you hone your rhetorical analysis skills. Learn Rhetorical Terms and Strategies. Of course, if you’re going to be analyzing the nonfiction works you read for their rhetorical techniques and narrative paper, strategies, you need to know what those are! You should learn a robust stable of rhetorical terms from your teacher, but here’s my guide to the most important AP Language and Composition terms (coming soon). If you want to review, there are many resources you could consult: Wikibooks offers a list of “Basic Rhetorical Strategies,” which explains some of the code, most fundamental rhetoric-related terms. MiraCosta college has another good list of paper requirements, some of the most important rhetorical strategies and proposal, devices. A heroic individual from Riverside schools in Ohio uploaded this aggressively comprehensive list of narrative paper, rhetorical terms with examples. It’s 27 pages long, and you definitely shouldn’t expect to know all of these for phd research help the exam, but it’s a useful resource for learning some new terms. Another great resource for learning about rhetorical analysis and how rhetorical devices are actually used is the YouTube Channel Teach Argument, which has videos rhetorically analyzing everything from Taylor Swift music videos to Super Bowl commercials.

It’s a fun way to think about narrative requirements, rhetorical devices and get familiar with argumentative structures. Finally, a great book—which you might already use in coursework info promotional your class—is “They Say, I Say.” This book provides an overview of rhetoric specifically for academic purposes, which will serve you well for AP preparation and beyond. You also need to practice argumentative and persuasive writing. In particular, you should practice the writing styles that will be tested on requirements the exam: synthesizing your own argument based on multiple outside sources, rhetorically analyzing another piece of writing in-depth, and creating a completely original argument based on your own evidence and experience. You should be doing lots of writing assignments in your AP class to prepare, but thoughtful, additional writing will help. You don’t necessarily need to turn all of the practice writing you do into polished pieces, either—just writing for case yourself, while trying to narrative paper requirements, address some of these tasks, will give you a low-pressure way to try out different rhetorical structures and social plan, argumentative moves, as well as practicing things like organization and developing your own writing style. Not the most auspicious start to an argumentative essay. Finally, you’ll need to practice specifically for the exam format. There are sample multiple-choice questions in the “AP Course and Exam Description,” and old free-response questions on the College Board website. Unfortunately, the College Board hasn’t officially released any complete exams from previous years for paper requirements the AP English Language and Composition exam, but you might be able to find some that teachers have uploaded to school websites and so on by Googling “AP Language complete released exams.” I also have a guide to AP Language and Composition practice tests (coming soon).

Once you’re prepped and coursework promotional, ready to go, how can you do your best on the test? AP Language and Composition Test Day Tips. Here are four key tips for paper test-day success. You are one hundred percent success! When you are reading passages, both on the multiple-choice section and for the first two free-response questions, interact with the text!

Mark it up for things that seem important, devices you notice, the author’s argument, and florida foreclosure crisis, anything else that seems important to the rhetorical construction of the text. This will help you engage with the text and make it easier to paper, answer questions or write an essay about the passage. Think About Every Text’s Overarching Purpose and essay, Argument. Narrative! Similarly, with every passage you read, consider the author’s overarching purpose and argument. If you can confidently figure out what the author’s primary assertion is, it will be easier to trace how all of the other aspects of the text play into the author’s main point. The single most important thing you can do for foreclosure yourself on the free-response section of the AP English Language exam is to spend a few minutes planning and outlining your essays before you start to write them. Unlike on some other exams, where the content is the most important aspect of the essay, on the AP Language Exam, organization, a well-developed argument, and strong evidence are all critical to strong essay scores.

An outline will help you with all of these things. You’ll be able to paper requirements, make sure each part of your argument is logical, has sufficient evidence, and that your paragraphs are arranged in a way that is clear and info, flows well. Anticipate and Address Counterarguments. Another thing you can do to give your free responses an extra boost is to narrative paper requirements, identify counterarguments to your position and address them within your essay. This not only helps shore up your own position, but it's also a fairly sophisticated move in a timed essay that will win you kudos with AP graders. Address counterarguments properly or they might get returned to sender! The AP Language and Composition exam tests your rhetorical skills. Coursework Promotional! The exam has two sections.

The first section is an hour-long, 52-55 question multiple-choice test based on the rhetorical techniques and strategies deployed in nonfiction passages. The second section is requirements a two-hour free-response section (with a 15-minute initial reading period) with three essay questions: one where you must synthesize given sources to make an original argument, one where you must rhetorically analyze a given passage, and one where you must create a wholly original argument about an issue with no outside sources given. You’ll receive one point for every correct answer on the multiple-choice section of the exam, which is worth 45% of your score. The free-response section is worth 55% of your score. For each free-response question, you’ll get a score based on a rubric from 1-9. Your total raw score will be converted to a scaled score from 1-5.

Here are some test prep strategies for countryside essay AP Lang: Read nonfiction with an eye for rhetoric Learn rhetorical strategies and techniques Practice writing to deploy rhetorical skills Practice for paper requirements the exam! Here are some test-day success tips: Interact with each passage you encounter! Consider every text’s overarching purpose and argument. Keep track of personal statement msc, time Plan your essays Identify and address counterarguments in your essays. With all of this knowledge, you’re ready to slay the AP English Language and Composition beast! Noble knight, prepare to slay the AP dragon! Want to improve your SAT score by 160 points or your ACT score by narrative, 4 points? We've written a guide for each test about the top 5 strategies you must be using to have a shot at branding case improving your score. Download it for free now: Have friends who also need help with test prep? Share this article!

Ellen has extensive education mentorship experience and is deeply committed to helping students succeed in all areas of life. She received a BA from Harvard in Folklore and narrative, Mythology and is currently pursuing graduate studies at Columbia University. You should definitely follow us on social media. You'll get updates on countryside essay our latest articles right on your feed. Follow us on all 3 of our social networks: Have any questions about narrative paper, this article or other topics? Ask below and we'll reply! Series: How to Get 800 on coursework info code Each SAT Section: Series: How to Get to 600 on Each SAT Section: Series: How to Get 36 on paper Each ACT Section: Our hand-selected experts help you in coursework info promotional a variety of other topics! Looking for Graduate School Test Prep?

Check out our top-rated graduate blogs here: Get the latest articles and test prep tips! © PrepScholar 2013-2015. Paper! All rights reserved. SAT® is a registered trademark of the countryside, College Entrance Examination Board TM . The College Entrance Examination. Board TM does not endorse, nor is it affiliated in any way with the owner or any content of this site.

Expert Essay Writers -
Narrative Paper Requirements - …

2300-320-7 - Intramural Research Training Award (IRTA) Program Automated Fellowship Payment System. Remove: NIH Manual 2300-320-7 dated 8/1/03. Insert: NIH Manual 2300-320-7 dated 2/24/09. PLEASE NOTE: For information on: For information on content of this chapter, contact the narrative requirements issuing office listed above. NIH Manual System, contact the Division of Management Support, OMA on 301-496-4606, or enter this url: http://oma.od.nih.gov/public/MS/manualchapters/Pages/default.aspx. This chapter transmits the NIH policy on the use of the NIH Intramural Research Training Award (IRTA) Program. IRTA Traineeships are established for the principal benefit of the participant and to provide opportunities for developmental training and branding case study practical research experience in a variety of disciplines related to biomedical research, medical library research and related fields. Traineeships are designed to provide research training “for which fellowship support is not provided under Section 487 of the Public Health Services (PHS) Act, and which is not residency training of physicians or other health professionals.” Training must be carried out at paper, a facility of the NIH, but may be supplemented by info promotional additional training acquired at another institution which is found by the Director to be directly related to the purpose of the traineeship and necessary to paper its successful completion.

Training outside of NIH must not comprise a majority of the training. The IRTA Program encourages the participation of individuals from crisis groups who are underrepresented in biomedical research: women, persons with disabilities, and individuals of diverse ethnic and racial backgrounds. Service is a by-product of the IRTA Program unlike Research and Clinical Fellowships where service is a dominant part of the training objective. NOTE: Trainees may not independently engage in narrative, patient care activities (any clinically-related activity MUST explicitly be under the direct supervision and control of an NIH employee), be assigned official supervisory responsibilities, or sign documents on behalf of the Government (e.g., requisitions). (1) The Director, NIH, may conduct and support research training for which fellowship support is not provided under Section 487 of the PHS Act and which is not residency training of physicians or other health professionals [42 U.S.C. Case? 282(b)(13)]; (2) the Directors of the national research institutes may conduct and support research training for which fellowship support is not provided under Section 487, and which is not residency training of requirements physicians or other health professionals [42 U.S.C. 284(b)(1)(C)]; (3) the National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine, OD, NIH, may conduct research training as described in 42 U.S.C. 287c-21(a); (4) the phd research proposal help National Library of Medicine (NLM) may conduct research training as described in 42 U.S.C. 286b-3 (NLM Traineeships limited to Post-baccalaureate students only); (5) the National Center on narrative paper requirements, Minority Health and Health Disparities, OD, NIH, may conduct research training as described in 42 U.S.C. 287c-31.

(6) 42 CFR Part 63, Public Health Service Regulations re: Traineeships. See Appendix 10 (Delegations of Authority) Approval by the Deputy Director Intramural Research ( DDIR) is required for all exceptions to program provisions. Requests for exceptions to program provisions must be fully justified in phd research proposal, writing, describing the nature and basis for the exception. Trainees are not Federal employees, are subject to narrative requirements the availability of space, funds, and case study india preceptors’ time, and are limited by the number of training assignments available within participating Institutes or Centers (IC). Traineeships are contingent upon submission of acceptable proof of U.S. citizenship or resident alien status, and a medical evaluation if applicable. In addition, trainees must meet the requirements of one of the categories specified below: G. Duration of Program Traineeship Programs. Time spent on a Traineeship program within any IC counts toward the total Traineeship duration, regardless of the narrative number of Traineeships granted by phd research different ICs. The duration of the award period and the original termination date will be extended due to periods (4-12 months) of excused absence without stipend.

All renewals must be in writing and include beginning and narrative requirements termination dates. 1 to 3 year (2-3 year Traineeships must be processed in 1 year increments.) 1 month to phd research proposal 2 years (2 year Traineeships must be processed in 1 year increments.) 2 years (2 year Traineeships must be processed in narrative paper requirements, 1 year increments.) 1 month to 1 year.

Traineeships of study less than 1 month or greater than 1 year may not be authorized. 1 or 2-year increments. 1-month to 1-year increments. 1-month to 1-year increments. May return for summer and other traineeship periods for as long as trainee remains a student in good standing.

A terminal Traineeship period not to exceed 3 months is permitted. Trainees do not incur a service payback obligation. Provided they meet eligibility requirements, trainees may be considered for, but are not entitled to, employment or other training appointments at the NIH. The automated Fellowship Payment System (FPS) is programmed for full-time schedules. For full-time schedules less than one year in duration, the narrative requirements system will calculate the correct amount of countryside essay pro-rated funds to obligate. However, for part-time schedules, ICs must compute the narrative paper requirements percent of time and enter the annual prorated stipend in the Fellowship Payment stipend screen. Scheduling policy for the different Traineeship programs is as follows: NOTE: Part-time schedules of learning theory essay less than 32 hours per week may affect eligibility for health insurance offered by the Foundation for Advanced Education in the Sciences (FAES) or other health plans.

NOTE: Part-time schedules of less than 32 hours per week may affect eligibility for health insurance offered by the Foundation for Advanced Education in the Sciences (FAES) or other health plans. Stipends are established based on narrative paper requirements, relevant research experience or completed education level. Stipend ranges and/or fixed stipend levels are periodically reviewed by the Office of Intramural Research (OIR) in theory essay, consultation with the NIH Board of Scientific Directors. See appendices for detailed information. Stipends are established based on 5 or fewer years of paper relevant postdoctoralresearch experience and business school msc up to narrative paper 2 additional years of promotional code experience not oriented towards research (i.e., clinical training for physicians). NOTE: Stipend level must be prorated based on training schedule. Stipends are established based on the number of years of postbaccalaureate education completed upon activation of Traineeship. NOTE: Stipend level must be prorated based on training schedule.

Postbaccalaureate education completed upon activation of Traineeship can only include postbaccalaureate training in an NIH laboratory or relevant professional medical or graduate school enrollment. NOTE: Stipend level must be prorated based on training schedule. Stipends are established based on the degree and amount of relevant experience at activation of narrative Traineeship. NOTE: Stipend level must be prorated based on training schedule. Stipends are established based on the amount of florida foreclosure crisis essay education completed upon activation of Traineeship.

NOTE: Stipend level must be prorated based on narrative, training schedule. A stipend increase of up to countryside $2,000 per annum may be granted based on growth, development, and accomplishments, but where warranted, increments can be larger, provided they do not exceed the appropriate stipend range (Appendix 1). ICs may approve a one-time merit-based exceptional stipend increase of one stipend step level at narrative, the time of renewal for 10 percent of its trainees, e.g., a trainee with one year of branding case india postdoctoral experience could be paid a stipend within the narrative requirements range for the two-year experience level. A stipend increase to the next higher level in Appendix 2 may be granted per promotional annum, based on progress in academic studies and/or the training assignment, for paper each year the trainee remains in info code, the program . A stipend increase to the next higher level in Appendix 3 may be granted, if the award is renewed for second (and final) year in the program. A stipend increase to the next higher level in paper requirements, Appendix 4 may be granted per annum based on progress in academic studies and/or training assignment, for each year the trainee remains in the program. Eligible for the next higher stipend increase (Appendix 5) based on the amount of education completed. An additional allowance of up to social essay plan $10,000 may be added to the initial stipend level of narrative paper requirements postdoctoral trainees for previous training or equivalent experience in one of the following specialty categories:

Engineer (electrical, chemical, mechanical, biomedical); Computational Biologist: (informatics, information technology); Chemist (analytical, physical, organic, and social learning theory plan inorganic); IC Competitive Fellowship, e.g., Kety Fellowship in narrative requirements, NIMH; or. Fellow entering the fifth year, for help whom the IC wishes to provide a merit-based stipend higher than the top of the range for paper requirements the fifth year. Stipends are paid in arrears on a 30-day monthly basis. All trainees are strongly encouraged to immediately establish (or correct) an electronic file transfer in coursework info code, the NIH Administrative Database (ADB) via the Automated Clearinghouse (ACH) Vendor miscellaneous payment enrollment form in the ADB vendor database. An automatic $2,000 advance will be provided for trainees after activation. An amount less than $2,000 may be provided after activation, based on hardship as determined and approved by the IC Scientific Director prior to narrative paper requirements the award start date that is entered into the FPS. Any advance payment will reduce the annual stipend payment.

The remainder of the stipend balance will be paid in social essay plan, arrears in 12 equal monthly amounts. Paper? Subsequent monthly stipend payments, for those that have ACH, are direct-deposited, usually within the first 5 business days of each month. Trainees who do not have established electronic file transfers to their bank accounts will receive stipend payments by check on or about the 10th business day of each month. If the trainee leaves within 12 months of the social theory plan initiation of the award, the final check may NOT be for the 1/12th amount because it will have been offset by paper requirements the balance of the advance. The trainee may owe money to NIH if the time served does not offset the countryside balance of the advance. A personal check covering a stipend overpayment must be hand-carried to the Office of Financial Management “Fellowship Payment Office” with a copy of the FPS-generated termination notice.

Any un-recovered overpayment will be treated as a debt owed to the U.S. Government. Stipends will be made in equal monthly payments. Stipend payments will be certified monthly and authorized in requirements, the FPS by the IC Designated Program officials between the 20th - 25th of the month so the cass business school personal msc Office of Financial Management (OFM) may authorize payments each month. If the paper requirements IC does not certify and authorize payment for study india a trainee, no stipend payment will be issued for that month until certification is received. Supplemental funding should be granted to Trainees who wish to come to paper requirements NIH for a period of research training under the auspices of traineeships or grants awarded by outside (non-Federal) organizations or institutions, when the branding case funding provided is insufficient to requirements support the Trainees during research training in NIH laboratories. Supplemental Funding should be granted: ONLY to Trainees who have already been approved for or currently receive outside (non-Federal) support; ONLY to Trainees NOT receiving support under the National Research Service Award (NRSA) Program; ONLY to foreclosure Trainees that have NO employment relationship with the outside (non-Federal) sponsor: other issues, e.g., potential conflict of interest, intellectual property, etc., must also be addressed. The amount of the NIH IRTA supplement will be determined on a case-by-case basis and narrative paper requirements will vary depending on the level of florida crisis essay support provided by the outside (non-Federal) sponsor. The supplement will be fixed at narrative paper requirements, such a rate that the combined level of countryside essay support will match the stipend rate for narrative paper requirements a similarly qualified Trainee.

Supplemental funding that would result in a combined amount from NIH and florida foreclosure the outside (non-Federal) sponsor that is either less than or in excess of the authorized stipend rate for paper the relevant trainee level and Traineeship program may not be approved. Supplemental funding must be terminated when outside (non-Federal) support ceases. An IC cannot provide a supplement solely to provide health insurance coverage – a stipend of at least $1 per year must also be authorized. Applicants may apply directly to a specific Principal Investigator or may apply online at florida foreclosure essay, the NIH Office of Intramural Training and Education (OITE) website. Designated IC Program Administrative Officials receiving application documents should determine candidate's eligibility. Traineeship preceptors and Laboratory/Branch Chiefs will review applications, evaluate and recommend candidates, and narrative develop individualized training plans for case india approval by paper the IC Scientific Director or delegated approving official. Candidates may not be excluded from consideration or evaluation on the basis of race, color, religion, gender, disability, age, national origin, political affiliation or any other non-merit factor. Appropriate documentation should be routed through the designated IC Program Administrative Officials. Curriculum Vitae (CV), bibliography (if applicable), 3 letters of reference, applicant's statement of info code research goals, official copy of transcript. In addition, applicant must provide official copy of narrative requirements doctoral degree and brief summary of doctoral dissertation (if applicable). CV, bibliography (if applicable), 3 letters of reference emphasizing research potential, applicant's statement of research goals, official copy of undergraduate, graduate, and/or medical school transcript.

Verification from the cass personal statement msc university that the applicant is in good academic standing; is paper requirements, enrolled in a doctoral degree program; and that the coursework school is agreeable to paper requirements the student's participation is cass business school personal statement, required. CV, bibliography (if applicable), 3 letters of reference emphasizing potential, applicant's statement of research goals, and narrative requirements official copy of undergraduate school transcript. Applications must be made online at http://www.training.nih.gov/student/pre-irta/previewpostbac.asp. Resume or CV, 2 letters of reference, statement of code career goals, and official copy of requirements undergraduate transcript. Applications must be made online at http://www.training.nih.gov/student/pre-irta/previewtechnical.asp. Resume or CV, 2 letters of reference, official copy of school transcript, letter from school verifying academic standing, information on honors and achievements, and statement of countryside interest in biomedical research. Narrative Requirements? Applications must be made online at http://www.training.nih.gov/student/sip/ The principal responsibility rests with training preceptor; other assistance is available from IC Lab/Branch Chiefs and Scientific Director. The NIH Office of Intramural Training and Education Career Services Center and NIH Work/Life Center staff are available for career counseling. All trainees may receive training or tuition assistance to the extent that it is directly related to the NIH research experience. Individual Development Plans (IDPs) are required for all trainees and they must complete all NIH mandatory training.

When Trainees will be working with animals, exposed to school statement hazardous situations, or in contact with patients, ICs are responsible for assuring that Trainees receive instruction, as appropriate, including but not limited to, safety, use of narrative requirements equipment, handling hazardous materials, patient privacy, human subject protections and proper animal care and treatment. Trainees may not engage independently in any patient care activities. Essay? Any clinically related activities MUST be explicitly under the direct supervision and control of an NIH employee. A rotation in a science policy office, generally only requirements one rotation of three months or less, is foreclosure crisis essay, permitted when such activity can be justified as an integral part of the NIH research experience. All training, regardless of duration or type, must be documented in the training plan and/or other appropriate administrative training databases and should be offered to paper requirements all similarly situated trainees, regardless of florida foreclosure whether they receive supplemental or sole NIH funding. In addition to the above: ICs are expected to fund training directly related to the purpose of the Traineeship, generally consisting of two courses per year at an accredited academic institution. In addition, trainees are expected to attend one FAES BIO-TRAC course or equivalent per each 6-month period and other seminar series designated by the IC. Travel cost to NIH for trainee, dependents, movement of household goods, and temporary storage of household goods not to exceed (NTE) $3,000 is permitted at the discretion of the IC; no allowance for return travel is authorized.

Payment of travel to scientific meetings or training at a remote site is at the discretion of the IC and paper requirements is subject to availability of funds. IRTA trainees may accept payment only on an “In Kind” basis to cover travel and per statement msc diem expenses from an narrative requirements outside entity while attending an “official duty” type event for phd research proposal the purpose of teaching, speaking or writing (such as presenting a paper at a scientific meeting), provided there is narrative paper, no conflict of branding case india interest in the source of the funds. No honorarium, or compensation for services rendered, may be accepted. Reimbursement must be from nonfederal funds. IRTA trainees must request, and receive, advance approval, in requirements, writing, from the foreclosure IC Scientific Director in order to accept outside travel reimbursement. The HHS Form 348 is not to be used since Postdoctoral Trainees are not Government employees. However, IC administrative staff, on narrative requirements, behalf of an IRTA Trainee, must complete an Acceptance Letter and a Certification Checklist indicating that the funding source is non-federal. For additional information, see NIH Manual 1500, Chapter 08-00(F)(3)). When a separate travel allowance is available through an outside sponsor, at its discretion, an IC will supplement that allowance only to the extent that outside funding is insufficient to pay authorized travel costs.

A personal check covering a travel advance overpayment must be hand-carried to the Cashier’s Office attached to coursework info promotional code a copy of the travel voucher. Any un-recovered overpayment will be treated as a debt owed the U.S. Government. Use the FPS to process terminations of narrative paper requirements all trainees immediately. Termination of the traineeship may be made prior to social learning theory plan specific expiration date for scientific or other forms of narrative requirements misconduct or failure to comply with terms of the traineeship or to carry out info promotional, or satisfy the purpose for which it was made. All termination proposals for cause must be in writing and provide the trainee with an paper opportunity to make a reply before a decision is rendered. In the case of personal incompatibility or any unforeseen programmatic circumstances, and absent any conduct issues, the IC should arrange for transfer of the trainee to another laboratory.

Fiscal considerations should not be the promotional code basis for early termination within the NIH Intramural Research Program. Trainees must reimburse Office of Financial Management (OFM), NIH for any and all stipend overpayments prior to paper requirements OFM clearance. A personal check must be hand-carried to the OFM “Fellowship Payment Office” with a copy of the FPS-generated termination notice. Any un-recovered overpayment will be treated as a debt owed the U.S. Government. Countryside? In addition, if the Foundation for Advanced Education in the Sciences (FAES) (301-496-8063) is handling the trainee’s health insurance, it must be provided a “Notification of Termination” form, obtained from the IC’s Administrative Officer.

The FPS-generated “Notification of Termination” form must be hand-carried to FAES, which will provide advice and answer questions on Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act (C.O.B.R.A.) benefits. The form must be signed by an FAES representative before the end of the month in which the narrative paper fellowship is branding case india, terminated to avoid overpayment. If a trainee is requirements, transferring to another IC within NIH, the losing IC must indicate this in the FPS module and florida essay notify the gaining IC. The gaining IC must accept and retrieve the paper trainee’s record. The effective date of transfer must be the first day after the original award has ended or the first day of the subsequent month. Trainees, because they are not employees, do not earn annual or sick leave.

However, they may be excused for: 1) Federal holidays, 2) illness, 3) personal emergencies, and 4) vacations when awards are for florida more than 90 days. For vacations, trainees receive a minimum of two weeks excused absence per year and the number of days should be prorated for Traineeships of narrative paper requirements 90 days or less. Preceptors may exercise discretion in granting additional short absences (less than a week per year) as they deem appropriate. More extended absences must be approved by the IC Scientific Director. Eight weeks of excused absence will be granted for the birth or adoption of florida crisis a child or other family health care. In addition, ICs must excuse absences to accommodate a trainee’s military obligations, e.g. active duty, active duty training, and inactive duty training Not to Exceed (NTE) six weeks per year. Z. Excused Absence without Stipend. Absence without stipend may be approved by the preceptor with concurrence from the respective IC Scientific Director and OIR. Through the FPS, the narrative paper requirements IC must enter the florida foreclosure effective date to temporarily stop payment and must reactivate the award in the FPS to resume payment. For absences of 4-12 months, the appointment clock will be extended to reflect the period of the absence without stipend. Absence without stipend for greater than 12 months will require a new appointment upon return.

FAES Elected Health Insurance: Should a trainee with FAES health insurance plan to be absent without stipend for less than 3 months, FAES requires the narrative trainee to maintain continuous health insurance coverage. Specifically, trainees must personally complete a Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1985 (C.O.B.R.A.) Application through FAES and begin to pay health insurance coverage premiums on the 1st day of the month following the case india start date of the unpaid absence and continue to pay for any month when trainee is not in narrative requirements, a pay status on the first day of the month. For example, if the trainee is absent without stipend effective June 15th through August 15th, the trainee must pay health insurance premiums beginning July 1st (1st day of the month following the start date of unpaid absence) and pay the premium for the month of August (any month when trainee is not in a pay status on cass, the first day of the month) Should the trainee plan to be absent without stipend for paper requirements more than 3 months, the trainee may choose to stop coverage and not pay the premium. Upon return to NIH, the trainee may then re-enroll as a new subscriber.

Should the trainee prefer to continue health insurance coverage during this period of absence, the trainee must complete a C.O.B.R.A. application through FAES. Code? Generally, C.O.B.R.A. coverage is limited to 18 months. Regardless of total time spent in unpaid absence, respective ICs must provide to FAES written notification generated from the FPS to include start and end date of unpaid absence. In addition, upon trainee’s return, ICs must provide a written notification generated from the FPS to FAES and OFM. All trainees may use the Occupational Medical Service for injuries sustained and narrative requirements emergency care on the training assignment. Workers' compensation and benefits under the Federal Employees Compensation Act, 5 U.S.C. 8101(1)(B) may be applicable in the event of a work-related injury. All trainees must have adequate health insurance coverage to receive training in NIH facilities. This requirement may be satisfied by a policy held either in the Trainee's name or in another's name with the Trainee identified as a family member. Verification of health insurance enrollment is required. An approved plan of health insurance is available through the help Foundation for Advanced Education in the Sciences (FAES).

FAES coverage requires that Trainees be on narrative paper requirements, a training schedule of at cass school personal msc, least 32 hours per week and a minimum duration of 90 days. Should trainees elect FAES health insurance, they are responsible for enrolling in FAES health insurance within the first 30 days of the award. Paper? Health insurance enrollment will be effective the date the trainee meets with FAES and all required forms are signed. Phd Research Proposal Help? Enrollment data that reflects the FAES effective date must be entered into the FPS . Trainees must maintain an existing policy or purchase a personal policy until they have met with FAES and elected health insurance. Funds for individual or family FAES' fee-for-service Preferred Provider Option health insurance are provided to FAES by the sponsoring IC at the direction of the trainee.

For a non-FAES policy, NIH will pay or reimburse for a policy issued in the Trainee's name in an amount not to exceed that of the FAES' fee-for-service Preferred Provider Option, individual or family coverage, as appropriate. Alternatively, NIH will reimburse for any additional health insurance cost, if incurred, as a result of being covered under a spouse's plan and identified as a family member in an amount not to narrative requirements exceed the cost of the FAES' fee-for-service Preferred Provider Option. Sufficient documentation verifying health insurance coverage and study india documenting health insurance costs are required when using a non-FAES policy. When the outside sponsor provides insufficient funding for the purchase of health insurance coverage, the IC may provide supplemental funding to permit the paper purchase of a policy equivalent in cost to the FAES' fee-for-service Preferred Provider Option, individual or family coverage, as appropriate. Phd Research Proposal Help? An IC cannot provide a supplement solely to provide health insurance coverage – a stipend of at least $1 per year must also be authorized, even when the outside funding is greater than the applicable stipend. See Section Z, “Excused Absence without Stipend” if applicable. In cases where: 1) the narrative requirements duration of the Traineeship is less than 90 days and; 2) the personal purchase of foreclosure a Health Insurance Policy would result in undue financial hardship for the student, the paper IC may pay the total associated cost. Trainees are not employees and therefore not eligible for Federal retirement benefits. Stipends are subject to Federal, state, and local income taxes; however, NIH does not withhold taxes from the countryside essay Trainees' stipends. The OFM annually prepares and sends appropriate income information to the IRS and to Trainees. Trainees may be required to file quarterly estimated Federal and State income tax returns.

Since interpretation and implementation of the tax laws are the responsibility of the Internal Revenue Services (IRS) and courts, Trainees should consult their local IRS office and/or tax advisor if they have questions about the applicability of the narrative requirements current tax code to the taxability of countryside essay Traineeships, the paper requirements proper steps to be taken regarding tax obligations, and concerns regarding their own situations. Trainees are likely to be eligible for coverage under the Federal Tort Claims Act (28 U.S.C. 2671 et seq.) for damages or injuries that arise from coursework promotional code actions occurring within the scope of their assignment and while under the direct control and supervision of paper requirements a Federal employee. However, the foreclosure crisis essay ultimate decision on issues of paper requirements liability is made on a case-by-case basis by the courts. Should claims arise from the actions of Trainees acting within the scope of their assignments under the direct control and supervision of a federal employee, NIH would ask that they be defended by the Department of Justice as if they were Federal employees. Outside employment for Trainees must be approved in accordance with NIH Ethics Office policies http://ethics.od.nih.gov/. The NIH Office of cass msc Intramural Training and Education will periodically evaluate the IRTA Program for representation of paper requirements women, minorities, and info disabled persons; to assess its relationship with other NIH Traineeship Programs; and to determine whether it is functioning effectively and narrative paper accomplishing the purpose for which it was designed. The results of these evaluations and any recommendations for changes to the Program will be presented to the Office of learning plan Intramural Research (OIR), NIH, and the NIH Board of paper Scientific Directors (SD) for consideration. OIR will periodically review stipend ranges and/or schedules in consultation with the NIH Board of Scientific Directors. Recommended adjustments by OIR and the SD subcommittee on trainee stipends will be submitted to coursework code the Scientific Directors for review and narrative paper concurrence and then to the Director, NIH for final approval.

The publication and presentation of scientific research by Trainees are governed by the same policies as applied to other scientists, either employed by or in training at NIH, as described in foreclosure crisis, NIH Manual 1183 “NIH Publications and Audiovisuals: Preparation, Review, Approval, and Distribution.” Trainees, like employees and others working at NIH, are bound by requirements all provisions of Executive Order 10096, as amended, 45 C.F.R. Part 7 and any orders, rules, regulations or policies issued thereunder for inventions conceived or first actually reduced to practice while at cass personal msc, the NIH, as well as by requirements HHS Technology Transfer Procedure Manual, Chapter 203.1, NIH Procedures Related to Disposition of Rights in promotional, Inventions by Non-Employees Working at paper, NIH, Receiving NIH Intramural Training Support or Working On-Site under Research Collaborationshttp://ottintranet.od.nih.gov/Policy/203-1-Procedure.pdf (NIH-Access only). Trainees will disclose promptly, to learning theory essay the appropriate NIH officials, all inventions which they conceive or first actually reduce to practice during their assignment, and will sign and execute all papers necessary for conveying to requirements the government the rights to which it is entitled by virtue of Executive Order 10096, as amended. Records must be maintained in accordance with Privacy Act System Notice: 09-25-0158, Administration: Records of Applicants and Awardees of the NIH IRTA Program, HHS/NIH/OD/OIR/OITE (Office of Intramural Training Education) for phd research 5 years. AK. Retention and Disposal of Records.

Records Retention and Disposal: All records (e-mail and paper non-e-mail) pertaining to this chapter must be retained and disposed of under the authority of the coursework info NIH Manual Chapter 1743, Keeping and Destroying Records, Appendix 1, NIH Records Control Schedule, Section 2300 Personnel, 320 Staff Fellowship Programs (all items that apply). NIH e-mail messages: NIH e-mail messages (messages, including attachments, that are created on the NIH computer systems or transmitted over the NIH networks) that are evidence of the activities of the agency or have informational value are considered Federal records. These records must be maintained in accordance with current NIH Records Management guidelines. Narrative? Contact your IC Records Officer for additional information. All e-mail messages are considered Government property, and if requested for phd research proposal a legitimate Government purpose, must be provided to the requester. Employees' supervisors, the NIH staff conducting official reviews or investigations, and the Office of Inspector General may request access to or copies of the e-mail messages. E-mail messages must also be provided to the Congressional Oversight Committees, if requested, and are subject to the Freedom of Information Act requests. Since most e-mail systems have back-up files that are retained for significant periods of time, e-mail messages and attachments are likely to narrative be retrievable from a back-up file after they have been deleted from an individual's computer.

The back-up files are subject to the same requests as the phd research proposal help original messages. The purpose of this manual issuance is to requirements provide policies and procedures for florida foreclosure essay the implementation of the NIH Intramural Research Training Program. The Office responsible for internal controls relative to this manual issuance is the Office of Intramural Research (OIR). Through this issuance the OIR is accountable for the method used to ensure that internal controls are implemented and working. Frequency of Review: Periodic review of the fellowship process will be completed to determine if ICs are in paper requirements, compliance with policy.

Reviews will be conducted every 3-5 years. Study? Method of Review: The OIR will initiate and lead reviews consisting of a random sampling of narrative requirements fellowship files/documentation using a checklist that will monitor the ICs’ compliance with various important aspects of the policy. Review reports are sent to the Deputy Director for Intramural Research and to the Deputy Director for cass business personal statement msc Management, NIH. Reports should indicate that controls are in place and working well or indicate any internal internal control issues that should be brought to narrative paper requirements the attention of the report recipient (s). Questions on countryside essay, how to obtain these forms should be directed to the designated IC Program Administrative Officials. Fellowship Request (FPS-generated) Fellowship Activation (FPS-generated) Election of Health Insurance Choice 1, 2, or 3 (FPS-generated)

Absence without stipend and reactivation (FPS-generated) These documents (or copies) (in printed paper version) should be retained by narrative requirements the ICs as official system records for the IRTA Program. Fellowship Termination Notice (FPS-generated) Since all IRTA Traineeships are considered awards for training and india not wages for service or employment, neither Social Security nor Medicare is narrative requirements, deducted from stipends. Although definitive determinations regarding Social Security obligations and essay coverage must be made by the Internal Revenue Service and the courts, it is the opinion of the narrative paper requirements NIH Legal Advisor that Trainees are not self-employed but in training for social plan purposes of coverage under the Social Security Act and therefore, can not make Social Security or Medicare payments on their own behalf. Trainees are encouraged to discuss this with their tax advisors.

* If you require a 508 compliant PDF version of a chapter please contact manuals@od.nih.gov. Office of paper requirements Management Assessment, National Institutes of Health, 6011 Executive Blvd., Suite 601, MSC 7669, Rockville, MD 20852.

Write my Paper for Cheap in High Quality -
Narrative Paper Requirements - …

Analysis of #8216;Disabled#8217; by Wilfred Owen. The poem “Disabled” by Wilfred Owen, written in third person, presents a young British soldier who lost his legs from the First World War. The soldier is left in solitude, as he no longer appears charming to the others and his sufferings from the war changed him into a completely different man. Therefore, Owen presents the narrative paper requirements, soldier as extremely sympathetic by emphasizing that one impulsive, naive decision he made as a teenager led him to become ostracized and florida essay, estranged from his own society. First of all, Owen portrays the soldier as a sympathetic character by emphasizing that he was too innocent and immature to comprehend the possible consequences of war. The young man’s decision to join the narrative paper requirements, army had been so impulsive and illogical that he cannot recall exactly why he made such decision. The poet uses punctuation to suggest this- frequent use of commas and semi colons when he says “that’s why; and maybe, too, to please his Meg…” expresses the poet’s hesitation as he struggles to remember exactly why the protagonist enlisted for the war. The poet mentions “…. aybe, too, to please his Meg.. ” and “someone said he’d look good in kilts”.

The use of phd research proposal help, ambiguous words such as “maybe” and “someone” add to the vagueness of his motive. Since the readers are fully aware that catastrophes such as injuries and deaths occur in battlefields, the fact that the soldier joined the war without a logical reason shows that the decision had been completely spontaneous. As the majority of men would’ve joined the war out of patriotism, the soldier’s ambiguous or non-existent motive clearly emphasizes that he was incapable of making judicious decisions for paper, himself. Need essay sample on Analysis of #8216;Disabled#8217; by florida, Wilfred Owen ? We will write a custom essay sample specifically for you for only $12.90/page. The soldier rather saw the war as an opportunity to gain pride, love and narrative requirements, respect- this is suggested when the poet mentions “he thought of jeweled hilts for daggers in plaid socks; of smart salutes; and care of arms…” The frequent use of semicolons shows the soldier’s endless exhilaration towards joining the essay, war. The use of alliteration in “smart salutes” gives a melodic effect, and narrative requirements, the imagery used in “jeweled hilts” creates a mesmerizing picture. This suggests the countryside essay, soldier had only narrative paper considered the superficial aspect of the war. This once again shows how innocent he had been, as the readers often express horror towards the violence of war rather than excitement. His endless dreams and fearlessness also indicate that he was just like any other youths with ambitions.

This triggers the readers’ sympathy, as he was evidently a normal teenager in learning theory, need of guidance, and was simply misguided by paper requirements, the misleading image of war created by the society. Moreover, the readers feel extremely sympathetic towards the soldier as the society neglects and avoids him after he sacrificed his legs in the war. This is theory plan effectively seen as the poet juxtaposes people’s attitude towards him before and narrative paper requirements, after the war, constantly switching between past tense and present tense. Before the war, the protagonist was admired and welcomed by the society. The use of alliteration as he mentions, “girls glanced lovelier as the air grew dim” creates a pleasant sound, highlighting the fact that he appeared charming to many girls. The phrase “carried shoulder-high” indicates the protagonist’s superiority and prominence within the society. However, the society, such as the girls, avoids the protagonist as he comes back from countryside essay war as a cripple. He becomes completely alienated, seen as the poet mentions, “now he will never feel again how slim girls’ waists are, or how warm their subtle hands”. Narrative Paper Requirements! The use of enjambment shows the soldier’s longing for the past, showing that the all the essay, girls are no longer willing to get close to him.

Also, the girls “touch him like a queer disease”. The use of simile suggests that the soldier is perceived as an abnormality or even causing disgust. The word “disease” conveys a sense that people see his misery as ‘contagious’, leading to their reluctance to socialize with him. His presence within the society is narrative no longer appreciated, or even acknowledged at all. Owen states that the soldier is countryside essay clad in a “ghastly suit of grey”. The use of paper, sibilance and branding india, alliteration creates a sinister atmosphere.

This also exhibits him as a ghost, showing that he is almost invisible and is considered as a rather unpleasant figure to the rest of the society. The protagonist’s grey clothes also blend in narrative requirements, with the darkening atmosphere, indicating the protagonist’s gradual loss of significance and vitality. In addition, the society’s absurdity is revealed as the help, poet mentions that “some cheered him home, but not as crowds cheer goal”. This suggests that from the society’s point of view, scoring a goal in a football game is more important than greeting a man who had just sacrificed his legs from the war. People’s intolerance towards abnormalities shows the society’s narrow-mindedness. This also shows the hypocrisy of the society, as it had strongly encouraged the soldier to narrative requirements join the war by only presenting the cass business school personal statement msc, charming aspect of war. Requirements! Therefore, the soldier is displayed as a victim of the ruthless society, evoking the readers’ sympathy towards him. Help! Furthermore, Owen triggers the readers’ sympathy as the war seems to paper have changed the soldier from a teenager to an old man, both mentally and physically.

The poet highlights this by juxtaposing his life before and after the war. Phd Research Proposal Help! The protagonist had evidently been very energetic and lively prior to the war- the poet emphasizes this through his use of imagery. Words such as “glow-lamps” and “light blue” convey a sense of warmth, and choice of words like “swing”, “glanced” and “carried” indicate the ceaseless movement taking place around the protagonist as well as the large amount of attention he used to receive from the others. The use of enjambment also adds up to requirements the fast, lively pace of the poem. This shows contrast with the soldier’s state after the war, where imagery is learning used to requirements describe him as an florida foreclosure, old man. Darkness is used to represent the narrative paper, lack of motivation and hope in his life. Promotional Code! The phrase “waiting for dark” indicates that the protagonist no longer has anything to look forward to in his life other than death. The fact that he was “waiting” for narrative requirements, dark emphasizes his inability to move, as well as the fact that nothing could be done to improve his life.

The poet mentions that the proposal help, soldier “shivered in his ghastly suit of grey”- the color grey indicates cheerlessness and a sense of mourning. The use of sibilance in the phrase also produces a rather terrifying atmosphere, foreshadowing the worthless and solitary life ahead of him. Words such as “wheeled chair” and “shivered” are also used to present the soldier as an old man and show that he is physically vulnerable. The poet’s choice of diction as he states that sleep “mothered” the boys away from him suggests that he is physically and mentally incapable of supporting himself and that he is narrative requirements completely dependent. The readers become more sympathetic towards the soldier as it had been clearly shown that he has nobody to depend on. In addition, the poet presents the soldier as an social learning essay plan, old man as he reveals his different way of thinking. The soldier does nothing but look back at his life, as if his life is narrative almost coming to an end. His regret of the past is effectively described as the poet states, “ He thought he’d better join (the war). –He wonders why. ” The dramatic pause created by the caesura gives a stronger impact, expressing the wounded soldier’s profound remorse towards joining the war. Moreover, the soldier makes a desperate attempt to cling onto his memories and branding case india, remain a young boy, as he realizes that his choice of joining the war had been irrevocable. His denial towards the cold reality is narrative requirements shown through the use of branding case study india, rhetorical questions and narrative paper, repetition as he says, “Why don’t they come and put him into phd research bed? Why don’t they come? ” Although he is paper requirements clearly aware that girls are no longer interested in him, he acts as if he is completely oblivious of the significant changes in his life.

Although the soldier has no formal occasion to attend, he is clad in social learning essay, a “suit of narrative paper requirements, grey”. This shows his desperate attempt to hold onto his old self as a teenager, as back then he felt that there would only be happiness ahead of him. It is also seen as a painful reminder that his life can never go back to the way it used to cass school personal statement msc be. Overall, Owen presents the soldier as extremely sympathetic, as his impulsive decision of joining the war had not only led to the loss of his legs but his position within the society. Everybody makes mistakes in their lives- especially during their youth, where people are more prone to making impulsive decisions.

Since the paper, consequences are normally not as severe as what the soldier has to face, the readers feel that he had been purely unlucky and had simply been victimized by the ruthless and deceiving society.

Write My Essays Today -
ENG 101 Personal Narrative Essay …

college essay's If you are going to paper, use a passage of Lorem Ipsum, you need to be sure there isn't anything embarrassing hidden in foreclosure essay, the middle of text. All the Lorem Ipsum generators on the Internet tend to repeat predefined chunks as necessary when looking at its layout fact that a reader will. If you are going to use a passage of Lorem Ipsum, you need to be sure there isn't anything embarrassing hidden in the middle of text. All the Lorem Ipsum generators on the Internet tend to repeat predefined chunks as necessary when looking at its layout fact that a reader will. Our Specialized Free Dissertation Consultations. Top Quality Academic Experts are available 24/7. The expert of Academic Editing and Proofreading industry has over paper, grown over proposal help, the years. We are self-assured you will get attracted towards our work which we produce we assure the final high degree of the work. Paper Requirements? Unlike others, if your work doesn't meet our exacting standards, you can claim a full refund.

We promise you will love it. Consequently, we employ our editors and proofreaders from many different backgrounds. Some are teachers, examiners and researchers. We are the one who stipulate the branding case study, proper provision in the industries of paper proofreading and editing to offer 24/7 support to our clients. • We provide authentic references relevant to your paper. • Guaranteed original editing and proofreading.

• Your satisfaction is on foreclosure crisis essay the first step. Top Quality Edit and Proofreading Service for paper requirements your Essay and Assignments as per Academic Standards. Our proofreaders stipulate you the proper draft of your essay for the submission. We polish your words, choice of vocabulary, phrases and school specially the grammatical errors, to verify your quotation and requirements references agreed with the social theory essay, style guide. HIGHLY EXPERIENCED PROOF READERS ARE HERE TO HELP YOU IN YOUR ESSAYS TO MAKE THEM THE BEST ONES. WE REFLECT ON THE QUALITY. Our professionals are here for your convenience. We focus on your work quality that would be the huge matter for us.

Our editors are here to assist the student work which is narrative requirements, based on the essay, thesis and dissertation. WE DELIVER QUALITY AS EVERYONE WANTS QUALITY PAPERS AND WE DON’T COMPROMISE ON QUALITY. EDITOR CREATE PROPER WAY OUT. Everything that editor do is unique for you. They ensure you to deliver plagiarism free content. The basic way for proposal their proper attention towards your work is that they are the professionals and they know your work importance as well as your field. IF YOU WANT PROFFESIONAL EDITORS YOU ARE AT THE RIGHT PLACE.

WE HAVE THE PROFFESIONAL AND EXPERIENCED EDITORS FOR YOU. LINGUISTIC FEEDBACK AND EDITING. The editor concentrates towards the specific organization, paragraph structure, sentence making, appropriate tone and content evaluation. Our approach includes Parallel presentation for ideas, Peculiar diction, Argument evaluation, Coherence and logical conclusions. WE GIVE THE MOST PERFECT STYLES TO YOUR PAPERS AND EDIT IT ACCORDING TO YOUR REQUIREMENTS AS WE HAVE THE BEST EDITORS. INTENSIVE FORMATTING AND FEEDBACK. In our services, we provide you the proper documentation, evaluation of narrative requirements sources and timeliness, authenticity and promotional credibility for paper Parenthetical citation, provide proper work cited pages, Bibliographies and other reference sources. OUR EDITORS ARE HERE TO PROVIDE YOU WITH THE BEST THEY WILL SATISFY YOU AND PROVIDE YOU WITH THE PERFECT FORMATTED PAPER THAT WILL TAKE YOU TOWARDS SUCCESS.

PROMINENT CLIENT’S SUPPORT. We support our client from every step. We have an experience team to work with you to ease your academic tasks, with several ideas. We Ensure perfection, Delivered your work before deadline, Guaranteed plagiarism free references. OUR FIRST PRIORITY IS TO SATISFY OUR CUSTOMER AND FOR THAT WE HAVE 24/7 ONLINE CUSTOMER CARE REPRESENTATIVE TO HELP OUR CUSTOMERS. UK Study Help have created a fully transparent refund policy as we believe that honesty is the best policy. Customers are entitled to claim a full or partial refund if they are not satisfied with the work provided by our expert editors. Customers can request a refund within 7 days after the order delivery under following situations only:

If the customer requested the first revision on promotional the paper which came to requirements, be not satisfactory than he is entitled to coursework info promotional, request a 50% refund of the amount paid for narrative paper the order. If the customer requested Second revision on the paper and he is still not satisfied with the delivered product than he is countryside essay, entitled to request a 30% of the paper, amount paid for the order. If the customer requested Third revision on the paper and still find’s the delivered product to phd research proposal help, be not satisfactory than he is entitled to request a 15% of the paper, amount paid for the order. Customer would be required to provide valid reason and explanation for cass business school statement requesting a refund and narrative paper also proof of dissatisfaction. UK Study Help will provide 100% refund incase delivered order by editor was plagiarized. Countryside Essay? (Proof of plagiarism will be required) UK Study Helpevaluate each refund requests carefully as there are usually unique reasons as to why a refund request is made by the customers. Paper? Please note that if you request a refund, we may request documented proof that the quality of your order is low (e.g., scan copy of your instructor’s feedback, plagiarism report, etc.). Branding? After an evaluation done by our Quality Assurance team by comparing their findings with the reasons for dissatisfaction, the necessary corrective actions will be taken. Any refund request must be made within the Refund Period. A refund request will only be entertained if it is made within seven days of delivery. Once the Refund Period elapses, UK Study Help will not refund any amounts paid.

After the Quality Assurance Department has assessed the refund claim, the refund shall be made within 20 days. All refunds are made at the discretion of UK Study Help. ‘Agreement’ refers to narrative paper, these Terms of Service. ‘Company’ means the entity that provides independent research and writing services to Customers according to cass school statement, the defined terms laid out in this Agreement. ‘Advisor’, is the person, who has agreed to work with the Company (UK Study Help) on set out their limitations by narrative paper, the corporation to stipulate advisory services not above than the Company’s Regulations. ‘Editor/Expert’ is the person, who has agreed to phd research proposal, work with the Company on a freelance basis to provide research and writing services under the Company’s terms. ‘Customer’ is the paper, person who places an Order with the Company to countryside, obtain the Product according to his or her requirements and governed by the defined terms and conditions laid out in this Agreement. ‘Product’ is a document in an electronic format that is the narrative paper requirements, final result of Order completion. ‘Quality’ Assurance Department’ signifies the part of the Company’s organizational structure with the mission to guard and evaluate the quality of Product and service provided. Agreement to Act as UK Study Help Agent for You. UK Study Help acts as an help, agent for paper requirements qualified Assignment Editing Experts to sell original work to their customers The Customer appoints UK Study Help to locate an Assignment Editing Expert to carry out research and/or assessment services to the Customer during the term of the agreement in phd research help, accordance with these provisions The UK Study Help is narrative requirements, entitled to refuse any order at their discretion and in countryside essay, such cases, will refund any payment made by the Customer in respect of that order. Paper Requirements? The prices and delivery times quoted on the UK Study Help’s website are illustrative.

If an alternative price and/or delivery time offered to branding india, the Customer is unacceptable, the UK Study Help will refund any payment made by requirements, the Customer in countryside, respect of that order. In the event that the Customer is not satisfied that the Work meets the quality standard they have ordered, the Customer will have the remedies available to them as set out in narrative paper requirements, this agreement The Customer is code, not permitted to make direct contact with the Assignment Editing Expert — the UK Study Help will act as an narrative requirements, intermediary between the Customer and the Assignment Editing Expert. The agreement between the Customer and florida essay the UK Study Help shall commence once the narrative paper, UK Study Help have both confirmed that a suitable Assignment Editing Expert is available to phd research proposal, undertake the Customer’s order and have obtained payment from the Customer The Agreement will continue between the Parties until the time period allowed for amendments has expired, notwithstanding the narrative paper, subsisting clauses stated below, unless terminated sooner by either party in accordance with these provisions. In order to provide research and/or assessment services to foreclosure crisis essay, fulfil the Customer’s Order, the UK Study Help will allocate a suitably qualified Assignment Editing Expert which it deems to hold appropriate levels of qualification and experience to undertake the Customer’s Order The UK Study Help undertakes to exercise all reasonable skill and judgment in allocating a suitable Assignment Editing Expert, having regard to the available Assignment Editing Experts’ qualifications, experience and quality record with us, and to any available information the UK Study Help has about the Customer’s degree or course Once the UK Study Help has located a suitable Assignment Editing Expert and obtained payment from the Customer, the Customer acknowledges that the Order is narrative paper, binding and no refund will be issued. The Customer will give the foreclosure crisis, UK Study Help clear briefings and ensure that all the facts given about the Order are accurate The UK Study Help will co-operate fully with the requirements, Customer and use reasonable care and skill to study, make the narrative paper requirements, Order provided as successful as is to be expected from countryside essay, a competent UK Study Help. The Customer will help the UK Study Help do this by making available to the UK Study Help all relevant information at the beginning of the narrative requirements, transaction and co-operating with the UK Study Help throughout the transaction should the Assignment Editing Expert require any further information or guidance The Customer acknowledges that failure to provide such information or guidance during the course of the transaction may delay the social theory essay, delivery of paper their Work, and cass personal statement that the UK Study Help will not be held responsible for any loss or damage caused as a result of such delay.

In such cases the ‘Completion on Time Guarantee’ will not apply. Where the Assignment Editing Expert or the UK Study Help requires confirmation of any detail they will contact the narrative requirements, Customer using the email address or telephone number provided by the Customer The Customer acknowledges that the UK Study Help may accept instructions received using these modes of contact and may reasonably assume that those instructions are generated from the Customer. Delivery – “Completion on Time Guarantee” The UK Study Help agrees to facilitate delivery of help all Work before midnight on the due date, unless the due date falls on a Sunday, Bank Holiday, Christmas Day, or New Year’s Day (“a Non-Working Day”), in which case the narrative requirements, Work will be delivered the following day before midnight The UK Study Help undertakes that all Work will be completed by the Assignment Editing Expert on time or they will refund the Customer’s money in countryside, full and deliver their Work for free The relevant due date for the purposes of this guarantee is the due date that is set when the order is allocated to narrative requirements, an Assignment Editing Expert . Where a variation to cass school statement, the relevant due date is agreed between the UK Study Help and the Customer, a refund is paper, not due The UK Study Help will not be held liable under this guarantee for coursework promotional any lateness due to technical problems that may arise due to third parties or otherwise, including, but not limited to issues caused by Internet Service Providers, Mail Account Providers, Database Software, Incompatible Formats and Hosting Providers. The UK Study Help undertakes that if such technical problems occur with a system that they are directly responsible for or that third party contractors provide them with, that they will on request provide reasonable proof of these technical problems, so far as such proof is available, or will otherwise honor its Completion On Time Guarantee in paper, full. The UK Study Help will have no obligations whatsoever in relation to the Completion on Time Guarantee if the delay in case india, the delivery of the Work is as a result of the Customer’s actions – including but not limited to paper, where the Customer has failed to pay an outstanding balance due in relation to the Order, sent in extra information after the order has started or changed any elements of the order instructions. Delays on essay the part of the Customer may result in the relevant due date being changed according to the extent of the delay without activating the Completion On Time Guarantee. Where the Customer has agreed for ‘staggered delivery’ with the Assignment Editing Expert , the requirements, Completion on Time Guarantee relates to the final delivery date of the Work and not to the delivery of individual components of the Work. The Customer agrees that the phd research proposal, details provided at the time of placing their Order and making payment may be stored on narrative paper the UK Study Help’s secure database, on the understanding that these details will not be shared with any third party The UK Study Help agrees that they will not disclose any personal information provided by the Customer other than as required to do so by foreclosure, any lawful authority, and/or to narrative, pursue any fraudulent transactions The UK Study Help operates a privacy policy which complies fully with the requirements of the Data Protection Act.

The UK Study Help’s privacy policy is available on the UK Study Help’s websites and a copy can be provided on request. The Customer may not request amendments to their Order specification after payment has been made or a deposit has been taken and the Order has been assigned to an Assignment Editing Expert The Customer may provide the Assignment Editing Expert with additional supporting information shortly after full payment or a deposit has been taken, provided that this does not add to or conflict with the details contained in learning theory plan, their original Order specification If the Customer provides additional information after full payment or a deposit has been taken and this does substantially conflict with the details contained in the original Order specification, the UK Study Help may at their discretion either obtain a quote for narrative paper the changed specification or reallocate the Order, as soon as is foreclosure, reasonable, to a different Assignment Editing Expert without consulting the Customer. The Customer understands that this may result in paper, a delay in the delivery of their Work for which the phd research proposal, UK Study Help will not be held responsible. Under these circumstances, the ‘Completion on Time’ Guarantee will not be payable. The UK Study Help agrees that if the paper requirements, Customer believes that their completed Work does not follow their exact instructions and/or the guarantees of the Assignment Editing Expert as set out on the UK Study Help website, the Customer may request amendments to the Work within 7 days of the delivery date, or longer if they have specifically paid to coursework code, extend the amendments period. Narrative Requirements? Such amendments will be made free of charge to the Customer The Customer is permitted to code, make one request, containing all details of the paper requirements, required amendments. This will be sent to the Assignment Editing Expert for comment. Theory Essay Plan? If the paper, request is reasonable, the Assignment Editing Expert will amend the Work and return it to the Customer within twenty-four hours. Branding Study India? The Assignment Editing Expert may request additional time to complete the amendments and this may be granted at the discretion of the Customer. If the UK Study Help agrees to refund the Customer in full or part, this refund will be made using the credit or debit card that the Customer used to make their payment initially.

If no such card was used (for example, where the Customer deposited the fee directly into the UK Study Help’s bank account) the UK Study Help will offer the Customer a choice of refund via bank transfer or credit towards a future order. All refunds are made at narrative paper the discretion of the UK Study Help. Unless payment is taken at the time of cass school personal msc placing an order, once the paper requirements, UK Study Help has found a suitably qualified and experienced Assignment Editing Expert to undertake the Customer’s order, they will contact the Customer by email to proposal, take payment. If, at their discretion, the UK Study Help accepts a deposit rather than the full value of the Order, the Customer acknowledges that the paper, full balance will remain outstanding at all times and will be paid to phd research proposal, the UK Study Help before the delivery date for the Work. Paper? The Customer agrees that once an Order is paid for then the Assignment Editing Expert allocated by the UK Study Help begins work on that Order, and that the Order may not be cancelled or refunded. Until payment or a deposit has been made and the Order has been allocated to an Assignment Editing Expert , the Customer may choose to continue with the Order or to cancel the Order at any time The Customer agrees to be bound by the UK Study Help’s refund policies and cass business school acknowledges that due to the highly specialized and individual nature of the paper requirements, services that full refunds will only be given in the circumstances outlined in these terms, or other circumstances that occur, in which event any refund or discount is essay, given at the discretion of the UK Study Help. UK Study Help provides well written, customer Assignment and paper Essay papers to the students.

Papers provided are only for countryside essay the reference purposes to assist the buyer by narrative paper, providing a guideline and coursework info code the product provided is intended to paper, be used for research or study purposes. The Customer acknowledges that it does not obtain the copyright to learning theory plan, the Work supplied through the UK Study Help’s services The Customer acknowledges that the UK Study Help, its employees and the Assignment Editing Expert s on its books do not support or condone plagiarism, and that the UK Study Help reserves the right to refuse supply of services to those suspected of such behavior. The Customer accepts that the UK Study Help offers a service that locates suitably qualified Assignment Editing Expert s for the provision of independent personalized research services in order to help students learn and advance educational standards, and that no Work supplied through the UK Study Help may be passed off as the narrative, Customer’s own or as anyone else’s, nor be handed in as the Customer’s own work, either in whole or in part. Social Learning Theory Essay Plan? In addition, the requirements, Customer undertakes not to carry out any unauthorized distribution, display, or resale of the proposal help, Work and narrative paper the Customer agrees to handle the Work in a way that fully respects the fact that the Customer does not hold the copyright to the Work. Study India? The Customer acknowledges that if the UK Study Help suspects that any essays or materials are being used in narrative requirements, violation of the above rules that the UK Study Help has the right to refuse to carry out any further work for the person or organization involved and promotional code that the UK Study Help bears no liability for narrative paper any such undetected and/or unauthorized use The UK Study Help agrees that all Work supplied through its service will not be resold, or distributed, for remuneration or otherwise after its completion. The UK Study Help also undertakes that Work will not be placed on any website or essay bank after it has been completed. Simon Evans ( Student ) The manner UK study help has removed grammatical, spelling and different mistakes from phd research help, my research paper, it modified into narrative amazing. Robert Perry ( Student ) It's far absolutely a difficult mission for me to finish my assignments until the professional consultants of branding UK study help. Jessica Rowe( Student ) I really impressed by the work quality provided by you in such economical price. We stipulate editing and narrative proofreading for correction in style, citation, structure, grammatical issues, argument issues and context etc.

The reference content which we deliver to the client is always authentic and proofread by relevant reference sources. Best Grade Guaranteed. We are here for you to fulfill your needs with your spelling, grammar, punctuation and as well as your work layout. We do not provide with any form of written papers to students. Phd Research Proposal Help? This site is primarily built towards guiding the students in ways where they will be able to grasp the ideas and implement them in their own work.

You can contact us for further details. Copyrights 2016 All Rights Reserved. We Value your inquiry and consider it our Top Priority to Get Back to you soon as possible with the most relevant answer.